Clinical and radiologic outcomes of Lima ProMade custom 3D-printed glenoid components in primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid bone loss: a minimum 2-year follow-up

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorRashid, MS
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, L
dc.contributor.authorShields, DW
dc.contributor.authorWalton, MJ
dc.contributor.authorMonga, P
dc.contributor.authorBale, RS
dc.contributor.authorTrail, IA
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-04T13:13:45Z
dc.date.available2024-04-04T13:13:45Z
dc.date.issued2023-10
dc.description.abstractBackground: The purpose of this study is to report the clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients undergoing primary or revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using custom 3D-printed components to manage severe glenoid bone loss with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Methods: Following ethical approval, patients were identified and invited to participate. Inclusion criteria were (1) severe glenoid bone loss necessitating the need for custom implants and (2) patients with definitive glenoid and humeral components implanted more than 2 years prior. Included patients underwent clinical assessment using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Constant-Murley score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH). Radiographic assessment included anteroposterior and axial projections. Patients were invited to attend a computed tomography (CT) scan to confirm osseointegration. Statistical analysis used descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation [SD]) and paired t test for parametric data. Results: Eleven patients declined to participate. Five patients were deceased prior to study commencement, leaving 42 remaining patients in this analysis. Three patients had revision surgery before the 2-year follow-up; of these, 2 retained their custom glenoid components. Mean follow-up was 31.6 months from surgery (range 24-52 months). All 4 scores improved: OSS from a mean 15 (SD 8.4) to 36 (SD 12) (P < .001), Constant-Murley score from a mean 15 (SD 11.2) to 52 (SD 20.1) (P < .001), QuickDASH from a mean 70 (SD 21) to 31 (SD 24.8) (P = .004), and the ASES score from a mean 22 (SD 17.8) to 71 (SD 23.3) (P = .007). Radiologic evaluation demonstrated good osseointegration in all but 1 included patient. Conclusion: The utility of custom 3D-printed components for managing severe glenoid bone loss in primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty yields significant clinical improvements in this complex cohort. Large complex glenoid bone defects can be managed successfully with custom 3D-printed glenoid components.
dc.identifier.citationJ Shoulder Elbow Surg . 2023 Oct;32(10):2017-2026
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jse.2023.04.020
dc.identifier.pmid37263477
dc.identifier.scopusCunningham, Lindsay J. - Author details - Scopus Preview
dc.identifier.scopusWalton, Michael John - Author details - Scopus Preview
dc.identifier.scopusMonga, Puneet - Author details - Scopus Preview
dc.identifier.scopusBale, Richard Stephen - Author details - Scopus Preview
dc.identifier.scopusTrail, Ian A. - Author details - Scopus Preview
dc.identifier.urihttps://wwl.dspace-express.com/handle/20.500.13063/101
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.titleClinical and radiologic outcomes of Lima ProMade custom 3D-printed glenoid components in primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid bone loss: a minimum 2-year follow-up
dc.typeArticle
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.98 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Trauma & Orthopaedics